Assignment 4

Overview of the Learning Resource

Brief Definition of the Teaching Topic

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to technological systems that simulate human intelligence through algorithms and data, enabling machines to perform tasks such as learning, reasoning, and understanding language (Jo & Park, 2024). It has profoundly changed how people access information, analyze problems, and develop solutions. AI is widely applied across education, healthcare, and business sectors, and its potential as a learning assistant is increasingly recognized (Peng & Wan, 2024).

This learning resource is designed to help learners understand the advantages and risks of AI in a rational and critical way. It guides them to master effective AI interaction strategies and apply AI tools efficiently in future learning scenarios.

Target Learners

Our primary target learners are university students and unemployed individuals. We believe that effective use of AI will become a core skill in future workplaces. In order to proactively adapt to the rising trend of AI-powered work environments, it is both timely and necessary for learners to acquire relevant knowledge and capabilities in advance.

Chosen Learning Design Approach and Rationale

This course adopts a combination of Project-Based Learning and Inquiry-Based Learning.

Through project-oriented tasks such as creating self-learning plans, designing AI questioning structures, and delivering group presentations, students are encouraged to explore real-world applications of AI.

By practicing, reflecting, and comparing different AI responses, learners develop critical thinking and inquiry skills.

This blended approach aligns well with the nature of AI learning, which involves continuous experimentation, optimization, and knowledge transfer. Therefore, the integration of these two approaches is ideal for achieving the learning objectives.

Use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and CAST Principles to Promote Inclusive Design

To ensure equitable access and participation for all types of learners, this course incorporates the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework and the CAST principles:

Multiple Means of Representation

All video resources include English subtitles and provide text alternatives for individuals with hearing impairments or language barriers.

Audio playback and screen reader support are also provided to accommodate visually impaired learners.

Multiple Means of Expression

Learners can present their work in various forms, including written reflections, oral presentations, PowerPoint slides, or video recordings.

Peer feedback and self-assessment rubrics are used to support different learning styles and cognitive preferences.

Multiple Means of Engagement

A variety of activities such as video-based learning, AI query experiments, group discussions, and final presentations are designed to promote active engagement.

Cultural diversity is considered in content and assessment design to ensure that students from different backgrounds can understand and discuss ethical and social issues related to AI from their own perspectives.

Technology Tools and Rationale for Selection

To enhance interactivity and accessibility, we have selected the following technology tools:

Generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, allowing learners to practice question formulation and response refinement;

YouTube videos to provide structured instruction on how to formulate effective AI prompts, with subtitles for learners from various language backgrounds;

WordPress for access to resources and Q&A engagement;

PowerPoint for group presentations, supporting clear and visually enhanced communication.

These tools align with the habits and preferences of modern learners, while also providing essential support for completing project-based learning tasks.

Unit 1: Understanding AI & Its Role in Learning

Objective:
To help students grasp the fundamental principles and functions of AI, and understand the role and potential of AI in the learning process.

Content:
What is AI? What is machine learning and natural language processing?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to technologies that allow computers to simulate human intelligence by “learning,” “reasoning,” and performing complex tasks. Machine learning, a core branch of AI, enables systems to improve performance by identifying patterns in data rather than relying on fixed instructions. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is the key technology that enables computers to understand and generate human language, allowing us to interact with AI tools like ChatGPT using natural language. Mastering these basic concepts helps learners understand the logic behind how AI supports learning and productivity.

Common AI Tools for Learning
Many AI tools are widely used in academic and research contexts. For example, ChatGPT can assist with writing, Q&A, and summarization; Deepseek offers web-connected, in-depth responses to complex questions; Gemini is deeply integrated with Google tools and has strong multimodal capabilities. Understanding the unique features of each tool allows learners to choose the AI assistant that best fits their personal learning needs.

What Can and Can’t AI Do?
AI excels at processing large amounts of information and generating structured content, such as writing summaries, organizing notes, rewriting text, or answering basic questions. However, it lacks human emotion, critical thinking, and true creativity, and cannot always provide accurate answers. AI doesn’t “understand” what it says — its responses are based on patterns in training data, which means it may generate misinformation. Knowing both the strengths and limitations of AI helps learners use it wisely as a support tool rather than relying on it for key decisions.

AI-Supported Learning Case Studies
In real educational contexts, both students and teachers have successfully integrated AI into their learning processes. For instance, one university student used ChatGPT to better understand philosophical texts by repeatedly asking and comparing explanations, deepening their grasp of complex concepts. A high school teacher had students design science experiments with AI support and follow up with group discussions, enhancing critical thinking. Other learners used AI to plan personalized study paths, helping them study more efficiently for exams or writing tasks. These examples highlight the vast potential of AI to deepen understanding, foster autonomy, and optimize resource management.

Assessment of Learning Outcomes:

Assignments

Short Answer Questions:

What is the definition of AI?

What is machine learning?

What is natural language processing?

Multiple Choice Questions:
What is AI not good at?
a) Processing large amounts of data
b) Repetitive tasks
c) Thinking independently like a human
d) Organizing information
Answer: c

What is one limitation of AI?
a) Having human emotion
b) Critical thinking
c) Creativity
d) Being free from misinformation
Answer: d

How can AI best support learning?
a) Letting AI generate all answers
b) Modifying your own answers after AI’s generation
c) Using AI to summarize and reinforce learning content
d) Relying fully on AI information regardless of its accuracy
Answer: c

Lab Work
Question: How do you plan to use AI to improve your learning efficiency in a specific course or skill?
In this lab, students will develop a personalized question and reasoning chain that they submit to AI for answers. The focus is on fostering their logical thinking and identifying the optimal questioning strategy.

Discussion
Students will discuss their lab topics and share the reasoning chain they used to ask AI questions. Through peer exchange, they’ll identify flaws and improve their approach.

Unit2:Effective and Critical Use of AI Tools

Objectives:

1.Master the basic skills and strategies for proposing high-quality prompts (Prompt Engineering).

2.Understand the impact of different questioning methods on AI output.

3.Have the ability to identify errors or biased information in AI-generated content.

4.Master the use of critical thinking tools (such as CRAAP Test) to evaluate the quality of AI output.

Core topics and knowledge points:

1.Prompt Engineering

Definition:

 Prompt is the “instruction” or “way of asking questions” for users to interact with AI. High-quality prompts can effectively guide AI to output accurate and in-depth content.

Key components:

Role setting (Role): Let AI answer in a specific identity (such as: you are a student…)

Task description (Task): Clearly define the type of task you want AI to perform (writing, analysis, enumeration, etc.)

Context (Context): Provide necessary background information to help AI understand the task

Format requirements (Format): Tell AI the output format (such as table, paragraph, list, etc.)

2.Three common questioning styles and their characteristics:

  • Imperative

Example: Write an article about climate change.

Output characteristics: The content is direct, but may lack depth.

  • Guiding

Example:What are the potential impacts of climate change? Please give examples .

Output characteristics:More open, encourage multi-angle thinking

  • Role setting

Example:You are an environmental scientist, please explain the impact of climate change from a professional perspective.

Output characteristics:Improve professionalism and tone accuracy

3. Analysis of common AI output problems

  • Hallucination

AI “fabricates” non-existent content or false references.

Cause: lack of training data or over-generalization of the model.

Example: fabricating the title of a non-existent reference book.

  • Oversimplification

Answering complex questions too simply or incompletely.

Common when insufficient context or restrictions are set.

  • Data bias

Comes from imbalanced or existing biases in training data.

For example: gender stereotypes, cultural bias, etc.

  • Missing or misunderstanding context

AI cannot truly “understand” the context and may misinterpret the intent.

4. Critical Appraisal Tool: CRAAP Test

Used to determine whether information is trustworthy and suitable for citation.

  • Currency

Core Issues: Is the information updated? Is it suitable for the current situation?

Application: Check the publication date and data year.

  • Relevance 

Core Issues: Is the information relevant to the problem or topic? 

Application: See if it revolves around the core of the problem.

  • Authority 

Core Issues: Is the author/source reliable? 

Application: Does it cite authoritative institutions/experts.

  • Accuracy 

Core Issues: Is the content wrong or unverified? 

Application: Does it support the data and have no logical loopholes.

  • Purpose 

Core Issues: Is the author’s intention neutral or biased? 

Application: Check for promotional/misleading tendencies.

Assessment of Learning Outcomes:

Multiple Choice Questions:

  1. Which of the following prompts is most likely to generate an accurate and professional AI response?

A. Write an article about artificial intelligence.
B. Can you tell me about artificial intelligence?
C. Please introduce artificial intelligence in less than 1000 words.                              D. You are a tech journalist. Write a 500-word article that explains the definition and development of artificial intelligence in simple language.

Correct Answer: D

  1. Which questioning style is most likely to encourage the AI to provide deeper, multi-angle analysis?

A. Command-style prompt                                                                                            B. Guided prompt                                                                                                         C. Yes/No question                                                                                                                                        D. Example-only prompt 

Correct Answer: B

  1. When an AI generates content that seems real but is actually false or made-up, this is called:

A. Bias
B. Simplification
C. Hallucination
D. Redundancy

  Correct Answer: C

  1. In the CRAAP Test, what does “Accuracy” focus on?

A. Whether the information is current
B. Whether the information is relevant to the topic
C. Whether the information is correct and supported by evidence
D. Whether the author is credible

Correct Answer: C

  1. What is the main purpose of optimizing a prompt when using an AI tool?

A. To receive higher-quality, more relevant responses
B. To make the input longer
C. To reduce the AI’s response time                                                                                  D. To avoid getting rejected answers from the AI

 Correct Answer: A

Personalized & Self-Regulated Learning with AI 

Objective:

Teach students how to use artificial intelligence to support their personal learning, including developing study plans, organizing review strategies, and tracking learning goals, in order to enhance their cognitive abilities and self-reflection skills

Content:

  • Using AI to Create Personalized Study Plans

Learn how to use AI to create effective study plans tailored to your personal interests, schedule, and areas of weakness, in order to improve learning efficiency and manage your time wisely. 

  •  Enhancing Learning with AI-Powered Tools

Explore how AI can help organize your mistakes, summarize notes, and generate personalized practice questions to deepen understanding and enhance review.

  • Developing Critical Awareness and Ethical AI Use

Reflect on the actual benefits of using AI in your learning (what has truly helped, and what hasn’t), while also understanding responsible usage guidelines such as avoiding the upload of personal information or original assignment questions.

Learning Outcome Assessment

  • Students can use AI to generate a weekly study plan, carry it out, and then write a reflection. They will analyze whether the AI-generated plan was effective.
  • Set learning goals and use AI tools to help achieve them.
  • At the end of the course, students will give a personal presentation based on their experiences throughout the semester, showcasing “How I Learned Effectively with AI”  this can be a presentation, blog, or poster.

Summative Assessment

  • Use formative assessments such as practice exercises and reflective writing to encourage students to experiment, make mistakes, and make adjustments.
  • Summative assessment: Students demonstrate their ability to effectively use AI for learning.
  • Providing self-assessment checklists along with teacher feedback can better support students in improving their skills.

Q/A

1. What is the main purpose of using AI to create personalized study plans?


A. To avoid having to attend school
B. To delegate all learning responsibilities to AI
C. To improve learning efficiency by aligning with personal interests, schedule, and areas of weakness 

D. To randomly generate study topics without guidance

2. What is the core of developing critical awareness and ethical AI use?

 A. Letting AI make all your learning decisions
B. Reflecting on which AI tools are truly effective and using them responsibly
C. Using AI to copy answers from the internet
D. Sharing your learning progress on social media to get feedback

3. Which of the following is NOT a recommended use of AI in this unit?

A. Organizing mistakes and summarizing notes

B. Generating personalized practice questions

C. Uploading original assignment questions for AI to solve 

D. All of the above

Referencesunit 1-

Jo, H., & Park, D.-H. (2024). “Effects of ChatGPT’s AI capabilities and human-like traits on spreading information in work environments.” Scientific Reports, 14(1), 7806. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57977-0

Peng, Z., & Wan, Y. (2024). Human vs. AI: Exploring students’ preferences between human and AI TA and the effect of social anxiety and problem complexity. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1217–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12374-4

Su, J. (2023, Novermber 14). Google’s AI Course for Beginners (in 10 minutes)!

 YouTube. https://youtu.be/Yq0QkCxoTHM?si=C3tB0GiOjricXOto

All peer review collection

Peer review post#1 https://suzuran.opened.ca/peer-review-of-post-1/
Original source post#1 https://learntech.opened.ca/post-1/
Peer review post#2 https://suzuran.opened.ca/post-2/
Original source post#2 https://ttaruc.opened.ca/blog-ii-direct-instruction/
Peer review post#3 https://suzuran.opened.ca/feed-back-about-post-3/
Original source post#3 https://maweika.opened.ca/post-3/
Peer review Assignment#2 https://suzuran.opened.ca/feedback-of-assignment-2/
Original source Assignment#2 https://healthandwellness.opened.ca/

Feedback of assignment 2

Course Overview

Learning Context and Inclusive Design  

Strengths: Clear objectives with a broad target audience, diverse learning methods, and a high level of inclusivity. 

Possible Improvements:  

1. The structure of the inclusive design section lacks coherence. The relationships between each point are unclear. Consider reorganizing the design principles or improving the logical flow between them.  

2. The tools used in the learning environment could be described more concretely and suggestions for using these tools.

3. Cultural inclusivity could be enhanced with more specific details. Including concrete examples can help make the plan easier to understand. Additionally, consider addressing how the course avoids implicit cultural biases—such as assumptions or prejudices about certain types of food.

Learning Theory and Design  

Strengths: Well-justified use of constructivism, strong alignment between theory and practice, and clear logical expression.

Possible Improvements: 

1. Constructivism emphasizes not only personal experience but also social interaction. It is recommended to add:  

   – A cooperative mechanism for students to design meal plans in groups.  

   – How peer evaluation or feedback promotes cognitive conflict and reconstruction.

2. The section on experiential learning could better explain the reflection process. For example:  

   – Are there reflective writing assignments or rubrics?  

   – Are guiding questions used to help students examine conflicts between their dietary habits and the proposed meal plans?  

3. The inquiry-based learning section lacks scaffolding, which may be challenging for many learners. Consider supplementing with:  

   – Structured guidance and prompting questions to support article analysis.

Assessment Plan Overview  

Strengths: Variety of question types, immediate feedback mechanisms, and appropriate adoption of the local BC high school grading system.

Possible Improvements:  

1. Suggest clarifying the non-graded formative feedback mechanisms:  

   – Are students allowed to retry low-scoring tasks (promoting low-risk failure)?  

   – Is teacher feedback based on rubrics or guiding questions?  

2. Clarify the connection between summative and formative assessments:  

   – Currently, the two types of assessments seem disconnected. Indicate whether there’s alignment of content or if formative tasks prepare students for the final test.

3. Specify the grading weight of different question types—for instance, how short-answer questions are weighted compared to multiple-choice questions.

Rationale and Technology Rationale  

Strengths: Strong theoretical logic, high alignment with course objectives, well-considered technology choices, and a constructivist approach.

Possible Improvements: 

1. Consider separating the pedagogical rationale and technology rationale sections to improve clarity and logical structure.  

2. All content related to using technology to support inclusive learning should be consolidated in this section for better organization and focus.

Unit 1: Fundamentals of Healthy Eating

This unit effectively introduces the importance of balanced and diverse diets. The statement of learning outcomes is clear and practical, especially emphasizing the application of what has been learned to personal dietary choices. Mayo Clinic’s videos enhance the authority of content and provide a reliable scientific foundation for learning.

However, I am wondering if the concept of “balanced and diverse diet” can be accompanied by specific examples or definitions at the beginning? Have you considered adding a short chart or dietary example to help learners who are not familiar with dietary guidelines better understand?

The course tasks are designed very well, encouraging students to collaborate and reflect, and apply knowledge to real life. I particularly appreciate the feedback from my peers. However, you can consider adding a brief feedback guide to help students provide more respectful and inclusive dietary advice in different cultural, income, or health backgrounds.

Possible Improvements: 

1. Try adding an introductory paragraph to give a brief introduction and set the tone for the unit.

2. Clarify learning outcomes to make them more actionable and concrete. For example: identify unhealthy eating patterns and replace them with healthier choices.

Unit 2: Social Media and Health Rumors

This module focuses on a very real and urgent issue. The learning objectives are set reasonably and have a good sense of hierarchy, gradually guiding learners to develop critical thinking skills from “cognition” to “assessment” and then to “application”. Based on my experience, this structure can indeed help learners gradually build confidence.

The health rumor cases you listed are very effective. However, I may have missed a part of the content – was there any activity in the course where students were asked to actually use the identification tools you listed to analyze a true rumor? For example, students can be asked to select a current health hotspot on social media and evaluate it using their ‘trusted information judgment checklist’, which can better apply theory to practice.

The selected video resources are very suitable. If possible, could you add some thought-provoking questions before watching the video? For example, “Is there anything in the video that surprised you?” “Have you ever believed similar rumors? What changed your mind?” Such questions may be more effective in stimulating reflection.

Possible Improvements:

1. The introduction could be more engaging. The current introduction is accurate but the language is a bit bland. A more engaging opening could be used to attract students.

2. The ending paragraph can increase motivation. Although the ending supplement is satisfactory, it can add some encouraging interaction hints. For example, encourage students to verify the health knowledge they have recently seen on social media.

Unit 3: Breaking Bad Eating Habits

This module is very detailed in explaining the psychological mechanisms behind behavior change. In my opinion, the introduction to the Cross Theory Model (TTM) is one of the highlights of this unit. The division of each stage is clear and well integrated with the improvement of dietary habits.

I appreciate your emphasis on “small changes” rather than burdensome big changes – this approach is both realistic and reassuring. However, have you considered adding an interactive tool to help students identify which stage of TTM they are currently in? For example, a quiz or multiple-choice question?

Lucie Edukale’s video selection is also great, with content that is close to daily life. You may be able to include some guiding reflective questions, such as: “Can you recall an experience where emotions influenced your diet?” or “What small changes can you try to make this week?” This can better help students establish a connection with their own lives.

Possible Improvements:

1.The current introduction is clear but a little bland. You can use a more life-like opening to resonate with students.

2. Make the video more guided and task-oriented. You can add some guiding questions or action instructions to the video task description to increase participation.

3. The ending should be more motivational and action-oriented. The ending can use a more motivating tone to guide learners to apply the content in their lives.

Unit 4: Quiz section

The quiz questions are concise and clear, suitable as a formative assessment tool, especially helpful in consolidating students’ understanding of dietary myths and healthy eating principles. You can consider providing a brief explanation after each question to help students understand the logic behind the answer and deepen their understanding.

I am also thinking, can we expand these questions into a small game or challenge task? For example, the “Rumor Terminator” challenge allows students to identify rumors in real online content and provide reasons, which is more closely related to their daily life experience.

Possible Improvements:

1.Try to add some more interesting mini-games and life practice tasks.

Overall feedback and suggestions

Overall, I believe this set of modules reflects meticulous instructional design, clear alignment of goals and content, and a focus on learners’ actual experiences. Each unit has a logic of continuity and progression, and the combination of multimedia, reflective tasks, and peer interaction makes learning more three-dimensional and effective.

You may also consider the following questions for optimizing course content in the future:

Can students showcase their learning outcomes in various ways? (such as video reflections, group discussions, posters, etc.)

Is there an opportunity to include discussions on food culture or economic differences in the curriculum to enhance inclusivity?

Are all materials friendly to students who speak different native languages or have different learning styles?

Some additional suggestions

The structure of this group’s learning plan is very clear. It covers key foundational concepts in nutrition, such as dietary guidelines and healthy eating patterns. This is also a topic that everyone should reflect on.

But as far as the main discussion question is concerned, it would be more effective if the topic could be more specific and less broad. As it stands, the question might lead to subjective answers. It could be improved by narrowing it down or connecting it to a particular context.

For example, a question like: “Based on the Canada Food Guide, how does your current diet align or differ from the recommended eating patterns?” would help guide students to think more critically. Culture can also influence eating habits — for instance, some regions in Asia rely on rice as their main source of carbohydrates, while others may rely more on wheat products.

Try adding some practical activities.In terms of the practical activity,  it would be interesting to divide students into groups based on their regional backgrounds and have them share their hometown’s dietary habits or food traditions. They could then explore the nutritional value starting from calorie intake. This could become a very engaging and insightful learning experience.

Assignment 2

Brief introduction

AI is an epoch-making landmark, people have diverse views on it. Some believe it is a powerful tool that can significantly improve work efficiency, while others see it as a “devil” that can increase wealth inequality and cause many people to lose their jobs. What we want to achieve is to enable students to rationally, dialectically, and objectively view the benefits and harms brought by AI after a series of experiences and reflections. Therefore, we will start researching AI. We will start with an objective analysis of AI from some literature, such as chatbots and their significant contributions to the behavior and perception of office workers (Jo. H&Do Hyung. P, para. 61), as well as considering the existence of ChatGPT from the perspective of students and its impact on students’ response quality, communication ability, service attitude, psychological safety, and response time.Peng. Z& Yan.W, para.72We will focus on designing a self-learning plan, submitting relevant and efficient questions, reflecting on articles, and conducting group presentations. Finally, we can judge the success or failure of learning from multiple perspectives.

Misconceptions about artificial intelligence

Misconception One: AI has emotions and thinks like humans and it has the ability to operate autonomously

Many people believe that AI possesses human-like consciousness or understanding, but this is a significant misconception. Theoretically, artificial intelligence is generated through data and algorithms and does not have emotions like humans. In reality, current AI is primarily based on statistical computation. Even the most advanced AI systems merely generate responses based on data and algorithms and do not possess true self-awareness or understanding. AI cannot truly engage in emotional communication—its responses are flat.

Furthermore, many people mistakenly believe that AI can learn and evolve on its own without human supervision. However, most AI systems still rely on manually curated datasets and require engineers to continuously adjust and optimize their algorithms. AI decisions are often influenced by data quality, training methods, and human-defined objectives, making it impossible for AI to operate entirely autonomously. Even the most advanced AI today only predicts and generates responses based on data and algorithms, rather than truly understanding or possessing self-awareness.

Misconception Two: All AI systems are the same

In my previous research, I explored how different cultures and religions shape people’s understanding and perception of artificial intelligence. For example, Western Christianity emphasizes the idea of “not playing God,” believing that even AI cannot replace a divine presence. In contrast, East Asian thought focuses more on AI’s role in human relationships and communities, aligning with Confucian ren (benevolence) and Buddhism’s emphasis on interconnectedness.

Additionally, I examined the concept of “digital resurrection,” which allows people to maintain a certain level of connection with the deceased through AI technology. While this technology may provide psychological comfort, its ability to truly help loved ones overcome grief remains an ethical concern. These cultural perspectives have led me to realize that AI is not just a technological tool but also a reflection of the values and belief systems of different societies. This also illustrates that responses to AI vary across different cultural contexts.

Learning Resource Fundamentals

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the way people access and process information.  From students to professionals, AI can serve as a powerful tool to enhance learning efficiency, expand knowledge, and develop critical thinking skills. However, to maximize AI’s potential as a learning assistant, users need structured guidance on how to ask effective questions, critically evaluate AI-generated content, and apply AI tools to their personalized learning journeys. This learning resource is designed to equip learners of all ages with strategies to effectively use AI for self-directed learning, enabling them to explore topics of interest in an engaging and efficient manner.

The course follows a cognitivist approach, helping learners develop structured inquiry skills while interacting with AI. By leveraging AI’s capabilities, users will refine their questioning techniques, analyze AI-generated information, and apply insights to real-world scenarios. This will be achieved through a combination of blog-style instructional content, interactive activities, and formative assessments to reinforce understanding and improve AI-based learning outcomes.

Learning Environment & Target Audience

This learning resource is designed for learners of all ages who want to explore how to learn efficiently with AI tools. The course is delivered in English, but multilingual subtitles ensure accessibility for non-native speakers, removing language barriers and making AI learning globally accessible.

The course is structured to accommodate a wide range of learners, including:

– Students (middle school, high school, and university) who wish to use AI for academic research, study assistance, and skill development.

– Professionals and lifelong learners looking to explore new fields, expand their knowledge base, or improve productivity using AI tools.

– Individuals with limited access to formal education who want to leverage AI as a personal tutor for self-improvement.

This online learning resource is available to anyone with access to a computer or mobile device. It provides on-demand, flexible learning, allowing learners to complete activities at their own pace.  Users can access assessments to test their AI learning strategies, refine their questioning techniques, and track their improvement over time.

By removing barriers to effective AI learning, this resource ensures that learners of all backgrounds can harness AI’s power for personalized, self-directed education while building essential critical thinking and inquiry skills for the future.

Big Idea

The big Idea of this course is to give students a general understanding of how artificial intelligence works and what knowledge related to the specific technical principles of artificial intelligence students should master by the end of the course. Several important chapters will be introduced below.

Machine Learning: Machine learning is the foundation of artificial intelligence, and understanding machine learning is the foundation of this course. The relevant knowledge of machine learning is interdisciplinary, covering probability theory, statistics, etc. The core purpose is to use computers as tools to truly strive to simulate human learning methods in real time. Students need to have a very clear definition of machine learning by the end of this chapter.

Deep learning: Deep learning is a subfield of machine learning. This chapter is an extension of the “machine learning” chapter. It studies the structure and training methods of neural networks. Its core idea is to simulate the neuron structure of the human brain to process complex data. As a small chapter, students only need to have a general understanding of machine deep learning, mainly to understand how deep learning can improve AI efficiency.

Natural language processing: The purpose of natural language processing is to enable computers to understand and generate human language, including word segmentation, part-of-speech tagging, syntactic analysis, semantic analysis, etc. This is to enable machines to understand and generate human language and achieve natural human-computer interaction. In this chapter, students need to understand how to use AI more efficiently after learning. For example, what are the key tasks of AI, how to make precise requirements for AI, etc.

Interactivity & Technology

In our activities, we will first teach the composition of the high-efficiency question system by watching videos and summarizing the main points. Then we will give students the opportunity to compare. We will set a theme and limit the number of questions, so that students can try to obtain relevant information by using the techniques they usually ask AI. Then, we can obtain information by using video and question structure of our teaching in the same limited number of times, and finally compare the efficiency of information collection.

We use PowerPoint and video tools to teach at events, and use things like ChatGPT or DeepSeek to make students feel the difference in productivity.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this course, students will develop a foundational understanding of AI and learn to integrate it effectively into their learning processes. They will be able to explain key AI concepts, including machine learning and natural language processing, and distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated content. Students will acquire skills to ask structured AI queries, critically evaluate AI-generated responses, and apply AI tools for research, summarization, and brainstorming while maintaining academic integrity. They will also explore AI’s role in personalized learning by adjusting AI settings to fit their individual preferences, using AI for progress tracking, and streamlining study tasks like summarizing notes or generating flashcards. Additionally, they will develop awareness of AI’s ethical implications, including misinformation risks, data privacy concerns, and responsible AI usage. Through project-based learning, students will create a self-learning plan incorporating AI tools, engage in AI-assisted discussions, and collaborate on AI-enhanced presentations. By mastering these outcomes, students will leverage AI as an active learning assistant, enhancing efficiency, adaptability, and critical thinking in an AI-driven world.

Inclusion Review

  • Evaluate the language used in learning content to ensure it is accessible to learners from different linguistic backgrounds, avoiding complex terminology or cultural biases.Also, try to use easy-to-understand methods when explaining professional terms. We will ensure that any personal opinions expressed in the language are explained individually, preventing them from influencing the reader’s independent judgment.
  • Pay attention to the examples and case studies in the resources, ensuring they incorporate diverse cultural perspectives. Different cultural backgrounds may lead to varying interpretations of issues, highlighting the necessity of analyzing these topics from multiple perspectives.
  • Ensure that discussions and activity designs take into account different cognitive styles of learners, allowing them to participate and understand the issues and content fairly.

Accessibility Review

  • Ensure that all video resources provide subtitles, making it easier for readers of any language to understand the content. More importantly, this will aid individuals with hearing impairments in comprehending the material.
  • Check whether learning materials provide text alternatives, allowing those with reading difficulties to use assistive tools to access information. This will help these individuals better understand the content.
  • Focus on the availability of text-to-speech functionality and screen reader compatibility to ensure that visually impaired learners can access resources smoothly.
  • Assess the user-friendliness of the interface, ensuring accessibility for individuals with mobility impairments, such as through the use of voice commands. This will help improve their ability to read and watch learning materials more effectively.

Interaction design

To enhance students’ understanding of how to effectively ask AI questions, I selected a YouTube video that introduces interaction strategies for AI models like ChatGPT and explains how to construct clear, specific, and useful AI prompts. Although the video itself is not interactive, students can actively engage in multiple ways, such as recording effective and ineffective AI prompts, experimenting with different query structures in ChatGPT, and analyzing AI-generated responses to identify biases, ambiguities, or misinformation. This learning approach encourages students to optimize AI interactions through practice rather than passively receiving information. To deepen engagement, I have designed a series of post-video activities, including AI prompt optimization exercises where students refine basic AI questions to improve clarity and contextual accuracy; AI query comparison tasks where students analyze responses to different questioning strategies and evaluate the most effective approach; and real-world AI application discussions where students explore how effective AI interactions can enhance productivity in academic or professional settings. These activities not only improve technical AI interaction skills but also foster critical thinking and precision in communication.

To ensure effective feedback, students will engage in peer review by evaluating each other’s AI queries and providing suggestions for improvement, while instructors will also offer feedback on query logic and structure. Additionally, students will use a self-assessment rubric to evaluate their questioning skills and assess the quality of AI responses. This activity balances feasibility and effectiveness, making it suitable for both small classroom discussions and large-scale online courses. Students can reduce instructor workload through self-assessment while benefiting from an interactive learning approach that allows them to iteratively refine their AI querying techniques. To ensure inclusivity, I will provide subtitles and transcripts for students with hearing impairments or those who are non-native English speakers, along with multiple engagement modes such as text-based exercises, audio reflections, and video demonstrations to accommodate different learning styles. Furthermore, alternative AI platforms like Google Bard and Claude will be incorporated, enabling students to compare responses from different AI models and gain a more comprehensive understanding of AI interactions.

Assessment Plan

To facilitate learners’ exploration, experimentation, and active engagement with concepts while preparing for assessment, I have designed a series of interactive learning activities.  These activities not only encourage students to think critically and apply their knowledge but also ensure they can demonstrate their learning outcomes through various forms of evaluation.

Assignments (20%)

Students will design a self-learning plan based on the question logic taught in class and the knowledge they wish to gain from AI.  They will create a structured set of questions to enhance their independent learning and critical thinking skills.  Each week, students will be required to research a broad topic of their interest and use their understanding to design their own question sets.

Lab Work (20%)

The instructor will provide lab topics, and students will be required to submit a well-structured set of questions related to the topic, fostering their research and logical reasoning abilities.

Participation (Discussion) (20%)

Based on previous assignments, students will write a 300-400 word reflection, analyzing their learning process, challenges encountered, and strategies for improvement, thereby enhancing their metacognitive skills.

Presentation (40%)

At the end of the semester, students will work in groups of 4-5 to create a PowerPoint presentation.  Each member will showcase their best-designed question from the semester, explaining its underlying logic.  Additionally, they will share effective techniques for asking AI questions and key considerations for improving AI interactions.

Final Evaluation Criteria

Students who achieve a total score of 65% or higher will be considered proficient in AI learning strategies.  This module directly evaluates students’ ability to formulate effective AI questions, analyze AI responses, and apply AI knowledge to real-world learning tasks.

Reference

Jo, H., & Park, D.-H. (2024). “Effects of ChatGPT’s AI capabilities and human-like traits on spreading information in work environments.” Scientific Reports, 14(1), 7806. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57977-0

Peng, Z., & Wan, Y. (2024). Human vs. AI: Exploring students’ preferences between human and AI TA and the effect of social anxiety and problem complexity. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1217–1246.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12374-4

Su, J. (2023, August 1). Master the perfect ChatGPT prompt formula (in just 8 minutes)! YouTube. 

https://youtu.be/jC4v5AS4RIM?si=jEBfBtGiFbYAIDZc

Project plan:

Yunyang Ma:Interactivity & Technology; Submission

Xinghan Wang: Inclusion & Accessibility

Fan Xiong: Ensure the logical structure of the content; References & Proofreading
Yingjie Zhang: Content & Structure

Post 4

In the video, a lot of information is given on how to efficiently use language to obtain the required information, which requires students to engage in imitation activities. However, this does not force them to completely imitate the way in the video, but to try to combine the elements in the video and write appropriate text by themselves.
They may be able to deepen their efficiency by taking notes on how to use a structure and personally try whether it works.
And the activity can be to compare students’ habitual AI query methods with the methods mentioned in the video after watching the video, and compare the number of effective messages obtained within a limited number of questions.
This activity may not bring me too much workload, but it is definitely a method for students to quickly identify their own problems and improve their abilities, which is very worthwhile.

Feed back about post 3

We are similar in our basic ideas, but I found that in the last question, we did not associate inspiration with our blueprint design. Perhaps adding a section on how to use the part of preventing problems in the blueprint can better reflect your understanding of inclusive design.

Post 3

I believe that the best way to meet the needs of learners varies for different students, direct instructioninquiry-based learningcooperative learningexperiential learningopen pedagogies The effectiveness of these different teaching methods undoubtedly varies among different students. Then we will try to achieve a ‘three-dimensional learning’ by focusing on one approach and incorporating other different methods. We will focus on demonstrating the correct and efficient inquiry methods to implant a rough concept of how to efficiently inquire about AI, and then have students explore the most suitable inquiry methods for themselves through extensive learning.

If there are online learning issues such as those caused by influenza virus in teaching, it is not a problem for our topic. We only need to use online meeting software such as Zoom to easily carry out our teaching work online.

In the presentation section, students may encounter situations where they don’t know how to explain their use of the problem or are too shy to express themselves. So during teaching, we will ask some classroom questions and praise the parts that students did right to ease their nervousness about the upcoming public speech.

According to our current plan, we have used multiple methods to test students’ mastery of knowledge, rather than relying solely on exams as a monotonous way to gain a one-sided understanding of their learning situation. I believe this can provide students with more opportunities for success from various aspects and also let them know their shortcomings.

For our learning blueprint, I think we may be more like GPS. Because our design focuses on guiding students towards success from multiple perspectives, much like how GPS analyzes the most suitable path from multiple paths to provide to users. I firmly believe that under our blueprint, students can achieve success, big or small, in this field

Post 2

Direct Instruction and Cooperative Learning are perhaps the two most commonly encountered learning methods at Uvic, and they can also be effectively utilized in our topic.

The main idea of Direct Instruction is for a lecturer to lead the explanation, demonstration, and clarification of students’ confusion. This passive learning is sometimes not the most high-quality way of learning, as students do not receive knowledge out of interest, but rather learn information provided by others. But students can clearly know what they should do when receiving guidance and learn useful content in a short period of time. In our topic, teaching students how to accurately search for keywords can quickly help them understand how to achieve high-precision AI conversations.

Cooperative Learning, on the other hand, allows students to explore and share experiences together to make up for their shortcomings in a certain topic, thus achieving comprehensive learning. This mutual assistance experience can increase students’ impression of the knowledge they have learned. In our learning, let students explore together the learning outcomes that different search methods can achieve, and finally summarize the most suitable and efficient learning method about AI for themselves.

In summary, both Direct Instruction and Cooperative Learning are suitable learning methods for our topic. By combining Direct Instruction and Cooperative Learning, we can learn how to efficiently ask AI for the information we need while finding a suitable way for ourselves.

In Therese Taruc’s article, I really enjoyed the understanding of Direct Instruction and its application. I think using Direct Instruction is definitely the most suitable way to learn about Alzheimer’s disease, a disease that is so difficult to understand its principles so far. Because only by summarizing the experience of predecessors can new and useful conclusions be attempted.

In Melody Hung’s article, I also found that the encouraging nature of Cooperative Learning, along with the use of communication and critical thinking, can have the same positive impact on our different learning topics. I think we can also combine Direct Instruction with their topics to gain a more comprehensive understanding.

Group E blueprint

Brief introduction

AI is an epoch-making landmark, people have diverse views on it. Some believe it is a powerful tool that can significantly improve work efficiency, while others see it as a “devil” that can increase wealth inequality and cause many people to lose their jobs. What we want to achieve is to enable students to rationally, dialectically, and objectively view the benefits and harms brought by AI after a series of experiences and reflections. Therefore, we will start researching AI. We will start with an objective analysis of AI from some literature, such as chatbots and their significant contributions to the behavior and perception of office workers (Jo. H&Do Hyung. P, para. 61), as well as considering the existence of ChatGPT from the perspective of students and its impact on students’ response quality, communication ability, service attitude, psychological safety, and response time.Peng. Z& Yan.W, para.72We will focus on designing a self-learning plan, submitting relevant and efficient questions, reflecting on articles, and conducting group presentations. Finally, we can judge the success or failure of learning from multiple perspectives.

Misconceptions about artificial intelligence

Misconception One: AI has emotions and thinks like humans and it has the ability to operate autonomously

Many people believe that AI possesses human-like consciousness or understanding, but this is a significant misconception. Theoretically, artificial intelligence is generated through data and algorithms and does not have emotions like humans. In reality, current AI is primarily based on statistical computation. Even the most advanced AI systems merely generate responses based on data and algorithms and do not possess true self-awareness or understanding. AI cannot truly engage in emotional communication—its responses are flat.

Furthermore, many people mistakenly believe that AI can learn and evolve on its own without human supervision. However, most AI systems still rely on manually curated datasets and require engineers to continuously adjust and optimize their algorithms. AI decisions are often influenced by data quality, training methods, and human-defined objectives, making it impossible for AI to operate entirely autonomously. Even the most advanced AI today only predicts and generates responses based on data and algorithms, rather than truly understanding or possessing self-awareness.

Misconception Two: All AI systems are the same

In my previous research, I explored how different cultures and religions shape people’s understanding and perception of artificial intelligence. For example, Western Christianity emphasizes the idea of “not playing God,” believing that even AI cannot replace a divine presence. In contrast, East Asian thought focuses more on AI’s role in human relationships and communities, aligning with Confucian ren (benevolence) and Buddhism’s emphasis on interconnectedness.

Additionally, I examined the concept of “digital resurrection,” which allows people to maintain a certain level of connection with the deceased through AI technology. While this technology may provide psychological comfort, its ability to truly help loved ones overcome grief remains an ethical concern. These cultural perspectives have led me to realize that AI is not just a technological tool but also a reflection of the values and belief systems of different societies. This also illustrates that responses to AI vary across different cultural contexts.

Most interesting part 

As society becomes increasingly reliant on artificial intelligence, the reason for developing these learning resources is that the widespread application of AI makes understanding its fundamental principles and technologies more important. Through these resources, I hope to help students not only grasp how AI works but also learn how to use AI effectively to face future challenges. I am particularly interested in the impact of AI on society and how education can help students critically understand and apply this technology, which is also an exciting new field.

Big Idea

The big Idea of this course is to give students a general understanding of how artificial intelligence works and what knowledge related to the specific technical principles of artificial intelligence students should master by the end of the course. Several important chapters will be introduced below.

Machine Learning: Machine learning is the foundation of artificial intelligence, and understanding machine learning is the foundation of this course. The relevant knowledge of machine learning is interdisciplinary, covering probability theory, statistics, etc. The core purpose is to use computers as tools to truly strive to simulate human learning methods in real time. Students need to have a very clear definition of machine learning by the end of this chapter.

Deep learning: Deep learning is a subfield of machine learning. This chapter is an extension of the “machine learning” chapter. It studies the structure and training methods of neural networks. Its core idea is to simulate the neuron structure of the human brain to process complex data. As a small chapter, students only need to have a general understanding of machine deep learning, mainly to understand how deep learning can improve AI efficiency.

Natural language processing: The purpose of natural language processing is to enable computers to understand and generate human language, including word segmentation, part-of-speech tagging, syntactic analysis, semantic analysis, etc. This is to enable machines to understand and generate human language and achieve natural human-computer interaction. In this chapter, students need to understand how to use AI more efficiently after learning. For example, what are the key tasks of AI, how to make precise requirements for AI, etc.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of the course, students should have a general understanding of how AI works. Then, by understanding how AI works, they should understand how to use it correctly and effectively, and even understand how to customize AI for individuals.

Assessment Plan

To facilitate learners’ exploration, experimentation, and active engagement with concepts while preparing them for assessment, I have designed a series of interactive learning activities. These activities not only encourage students to think critically and apply their knowledge but also ensure they can demonstrate their learning outcomes through various forms of evaluation.

  1. Assignments:
    Students will design a self-learning plan based on the knowledge they want to gain from AI and create a set of structured questions to enhance their independent learning and critical thinking skills.
  2. Labs Work:
    The instructor will provide lab topics, and students will be required to submit a well-structured set of questions related to the topic, fostering their research and logical reasoning abilities.
  3. Participation (Discussion):
    Based on previous assignments, students will write a reflection piece, analyzing their learning process, challenges encountered, and strategies for improvement, thereby enhancing their metacognitive skills.
  4. Presentation:
    In groups of 4-5, students will create a PowerPoint presentation, where each member will showcase their best-designed question from the semester, explaining the underlying logic. Additionally, they will share effective techniques for asking AI questions and key considerations for improving AI interactions.
  5. QuizWe will quiz three times before, during and after study, and make a curve according to the percentage of progress and decline, so as to get a more objective result. Meanwhile, four of us will score each quiz individually, and refer to the score given by ai to improve the accuracy of the score.

Reference list:

Jo, Hyeon, and Do-Hyung Park. “Effects of ChatGPT’s AI Capabilities and Human-like Traits on Spreading Information in Work Environments.” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, pp. 7806–7806, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57977-0.

Peng, Ziqing, and Yan Wan. “Human vs. AI: Exploring Students’ Preferences between Human and AI TA and the Effect of Social Anxiety and Problem Complexity.” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1217–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12374-4.

Project plan:

Yunyang Ma:Theme Description

Xinghan Wang: Misunderstanding and interest

Fan Xiong: Big Idea and Learning Outcomes

Yingjie Zhang: Assessment Plan

Peer review of post 1

I like your analysis of your teaching style, and I believe your judgment is accurate. As a student, I believe that constructing real problems to explain mathematics is a particularly effective method. Although it may take more time to visualize mathematical concepts, it undoubtedly leaves a deeper impression on students. I can always remember the scene when I was studying the Pythagorean theorem of trigonometric functions, where the teacher poured water from a square formed by two right angled sides into a square formed by the hypotenuse, filling it perfectly. It has been proven that this method of driving multiple parts of the brain to work together seems to deepen my impression of concepts.

« Older posts

© 2025 EDCI 335

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑